A Review by David Sooby
The
Expanse
is a new series on the Syfy Channel;
Tuesday night at 9 PM (Central Time). Fortunately the channel is re-running the
first two episodes frequently, almost daily, so you can easily catch up. Editor’s note: see
recent episodes online at the official website’s “Episodes” page.
The Expanse is an adaptation
of the popular hard-SF series by James S. A. Corey, the pen name of authors DanielAbraham and Ty Franck. The first
novel, Leviathan Wakes, was a finalist for both the Hugo and the Locus
awards for Best SF Novel.
 |
| The Expanse is based on the bestselling novels of James S. A. Corey. |
 |
| Steven Strait as series hero Jim Holden |
One of my friends said the
production is comparable to the reboot of Battlestar Galactica (BG), which in my opinion was the
best-written SF ever made for television. I don't agree it's up to that level
of quality, altho it is quite good and certainly a cut above most TV offerings.
The FX are high quality, perhaps comparable to BG or almost that good, but the actors look a lot more like the
pretty, nondescript, competent but not exceptional actors which populate most
series made for the Syfy channel.
 |
| Thomas Jane as Det. Joe Miller |
One thing that stood out about BG was the exceptional level of quality
of acting, from actors such as MaryMcDonnell and Edward James Olmos.
You won't find anything comparable here, or at least I haven't seen anything
outstanding in the first two episodes. In particular, the actor who plays Detective Miller seems too young and
too handsome to be playing an experienced, world-weary character. The directing also seems to be
merely competent, and not up to the high bar set by BG.
The TV ads for this series compare
it to Game of Thrones (GOT).
Again... no, it's not that good. And since this is the Syfy channel, sadly we
don't get all the soft porn scenes that we look forward to in GOT. The first episode did feature a
scene of zero-G sex, but sadly it was at most PG-13.
 |
| Florence Faivre as the missing Julie Mao |
I have read the first two
books in The Expanse series, and so far as I recall, they do seem to be
sticking fairly close to the plot. That's good, because it's a great story. I
hope they continue that, and don't deviate far from it... as, for example, GOT has done.
On the subject of real science
vs. science-made-stupid: So far they seem to be doing pretty well, again by
sticking close to the story as written in the book. This is a hard-SF series, a
story where the writer pays close attention to scientific accuracy; it's not
space opera like Star Trek. I did note in one FX scene they had a
sizable, maybe 10-20 ton ice boulder moving in zero G to dock at a space
station, and it was moving at something like 20-30 feet per second... perhaps
10 times as fast as would have been safe when approaching a structure where
people live, even using heavy equipment to grab it as it came in. Moving that
fast made for an exciting visual, but isn't at all realistic. However, that is
only a single minor flaw in an otherwise excellent job of showing
realistic-appearing scenes of space and spaceships. Not bad at all for two
episodes!
 |
| Ice-Mining in the Asteroids |
Overall, based on watching the
first two episodes, I'll give this a B+. It's very gratifying to once again
see, on TV, a well-done SF series that is actually set in space! It's been
awhile.
IMAGES:
Many thanks to Wheedonopolis for the title image, and to
